But we are served a portion which is enough for three.However, the decision was rolled back after opposition from a group of ministers.The study found that fruits and vegetables witnessed the maximum wastage of 4. This is wasteful and should be stopped," food minister Ram Vilas Paswan told this newspaper."Most of the times when we go out and order, for example soup, one cup is enough for us.. While the French already have a law against food wastage and organisations in India are running initiatives to take leftover food from eateries to feed the poor, the government of India has now stepped in.The study by Indian Council of Agricultural Research and Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology (CIPHET) was commissioned in 2012 and the report submitted in 2015.According to a recent government study, the country wastes Rs 92,651 crore worth of food in a year.Explaining that the move would help avoid wasteful expenditure of food, Mr Paswan said he has called a meeting of representatives of the hotel industry to discuss the matter and arrive at some kind of common portion size.

This is enough to feed a state like Bihar for a full tents for party year.The food and consumer affairs ministry had earlier also decided to bring another innovation by bringing in amendments to the Consumer Protection Act which would have made brand ambassadors responsible for products they advertise.88 per cent, followed by fisheries, which stood at 10. The value was arrived based on the production data of 2012-13 at 2014 wholesale prices.58-15.The government move comes after Prime Minister Narendra Modi had in his last Mann Ki Baat programme touched on the issue of food wastage and termed it as injustice to the poor.New Delhi: How much is too much when you go out to eat? The government will answer this question now by fixing the portion sizes of dishes served by hotels and restaurants.52 per cent.The minister said that the government was also forming a questionnaire for hotels and restaurants to explain what dish sizes they should serve to a customer. The government has also called a meeting with hoteliers later this week. The reason for this wastage was found to be the lack of adequate infrastructure.However, the study was done on the wastage food after the harvest and not cooked food which is being talked about now.

 The Congress expelled me 24 hours ago, even before I made the announcement.He was not attending the state Congress meetings for some time and even unfollowed Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi on microblogging website twitter to China Wholesale Party Tent Suppliers register his protest."Vaghela wanted that present PCC president (Bharatsinh Solanki) should be replaced and he be appointed in his place..Surjewala said the party respected Vaghela which was reflected in him being given important responsibilities and positions. I will not join any political party," Vaghela, who has had a long association with Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the RSS days, said.He said he will send in his resignation from the post of the leader of opposition to Congress president Sonia Gandhi on Friday. He headed the RJP government in 1996 before merging his party with Congress.It would, however, draw some comfort from the fact that only two Congress MLAs, including his son Mahendrasinh Vaghela, attended the event.Vaghela, after announcing his decision to resign, claimed some Congress leaders had issued a "diktat" to partymen to not attend his birthday celebrations.

We sincerely hope that he will continue to work for the party despite his decision to quit party posts," the Congress leader said. Each one of us needs to understand that interests of the party and its ideals are bigger than the ambition of one person.The Kshatriya strongman, whom his supporters fondly address as Bapu, said he would not join the BJP or any other party. He enjoys considerable support in North Gujarat. Party is bigger than individuals."Neither has Congress taken any disciplinary action against him nor has he been expelled from the party. He hoped Vaghela would continue to work for the party despite quitting his posts. You dontfight the BJP and wont allow those who do to fight them.Gandhinagar/New Delhi: In a body blow to the Congress in Gujarat, one of its tallest leaders Shankarsinh Vaghela, on Friday announced he was quitting the party which hadtaken "supari" (contract) from BJP to facilitate the latters victory in the Assembly elections.Vaghelas decision to quit the Congress months ahead of the election likely in November-December, would be a cause of concern for the party, which has been out of power in the state, once dubbed the BJPs laboratory for testing its hardline Hindutva, for close to two decades now. Both these claims are entirely incorrect," Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala said in New Delhi."

The former Gujarat chief minister and Union minister in the UPA government was at loggerheads with the Congress leadership for quite some time due to its reluctance todeclare him the partys chief ministerial face in the Assembly elections.Vaghela, currently the leader of the opposition in the Assembly, had quit BJP over 20 years ago and formed Rashtriya Janata Party."Today, I free myself from Congress and I set Congress free," he said."I have taken this sad decision after giving it considerable thought.Asserting that he was not a "bonded labourer", Vaghela alleged,"You (the Congress) have taken supari (contract) from the BJP to allow that party to win Gujarat. In the face of destruction, they lost theirmind. But I was left with no option as when I told them (state Congress leaders) to do homework to take on the BJP in the coming elections, they got together to push me out of the party," he said.The dramatic announcement By Vaghela, a former RSS volunteer, came at an event organised to celebrate his 77th birthday, a day after the disunity in the state Congress came out in the open when it transpired at least eight of its 57 MLAs had not voted for the joint oppositions presidential Meira Kumar."I am not going to join BJP. This is a decision of the party and its leadership and no individual can decide it.

If, on the other hand, the general election produces another hung Parliament, all kinds of possibilities emerge.The past fortnight has seen yet more twists and turns in the Brexit saga. It is likely to disappear. Ms May, who became Prime Minister directly after, could have opened out to other political parties to create a national consensus on the way forward. Its interests are more than vulgar political ones; they are Portable Hammock Suppliers national interests. Instead, she prioritised keeping the Conservative Party together, by appeasing her party’s Europhobes and shutting out the Opposition. The UK could remain in the EU customs union and single market. Like an abused wife who cannot admit that her husband is a brute and that the marriage is over, they continue to believe — deep down — that the Conservative Party is still the only party that can be trusted with the national interest.

It and the nation are one. The Scottish National Party, in government in Scotland, has said it will demand another independence referendum. He lost because he led a disastrous campaign, which completely failed to put forward a positive case for Europe. And it is this pathology which has informed the actions of a large segment of the Conservative Party since the referendum. Yet the vast majority have loyally toed the party line and spouted the party’s propaganda.The UK now faces a general election on December 12. Deep down they know what harm Brexit will cause.If Mr Johnson’s Conservatives win an overall majority, his exit deal will pass. Most of them voted remain in the referendum. Yet despite this victory — something which had eluded his predecessor — Mr Johnson decided instead to seek an early general election. Once Scotland leaves the UK, Wales is unlikely to be far behind. Although the outcome may be difficult to predict, it is easy to predict that the result — one or way or another — will fundamentally shape the course of British history for generations. It is this pathology which caused him to fight a half-hearted campaign, holding back from attacking leave-supporting colleagues. But the political impact would be no less immense. It involves Northern Ireland remaining in the EU customs union and single market — to preserve the soft border with the Republic of Ireland — and allowing the rest of the UK, the island of Great Britain, to leave. The sentiment in favour of uniting Northern Ireland with the Republic will be significantly strengthened.. There is already only a narrow margin in favour of remaining in the UK. The Conservatives, or the Conservative and Unionist Party to give them their full title, would have presided over the breakup of the Union; support for which has been virtually their only consistent principle since the party’s creation some 150 years ago. Meanwhile, the argument is being powerfully made in Scotland that if Northern Ireland can remain in the EU’s economic structures, why can’t Scotland too. It is hard to think of a more important election in British political history. And if the UK remains, although there will still be difficulties to overcome, the immediate threat to the country’s well-being will have been averted. Other parties when they govern are interlopers and, somehow, unpatriotic, so goes the thinking.It is this pathology which led Mr Cameron to think it acceptable to gamble with the country’s future to resolve his party’s political problems. Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson simply reverted to an arrangement that the EU had originally offered the former Prime Minister, Theresa May, which she had rejected.

More surprising was that this arrangement was agreed, in principle, by the House of Commons, where the Conservatives are a minority, by a narrow majority. The practical effect is to place Northern Ireland, an integral part of the UK, under a different legal and regulatory regime from the rest of the country. He wants a stable majority to prevent "his" agreement being amended out of all recognition by Parliament. The economic harm caused by Great Britain’s departure from the EU single market and customs union will be, in all likelihood, immense. One can only hope that the general election puts the Conservatives out of their misery and the country on course for a saner future.In the immediate aftermath of the result, there was a window of opportunity. This was no surprise. Recent polls suggest that this time the campaign for independence will be victorious. Forget the UK’s future, party unity had to be preserved at all costs. This has led to a deep sense that the Conservative Party is more than just a political party. Its fortunes and those of the nation are intimately bound together. After some misgivings, the Opposition parties acceded to his request.

There could be another referendum on whether to leave the EU; and — if the opinion polls are to be believed — the British public could vote to remain.Deep in the Conservative psyche is the feeling that the Conservative Party is the only legitimate party of government. At each stage of the Conservatives’ metamorphosis into a nationalistic party of the hard right, they have subordinated their own political personalities and meekly submitted. Although ostensibly correct, this explanation ignores the pathology of the Conservative Party.In the meantime, the political psycho drama continues, and the country has to suffer its consequences.With a few brave and honourable exceptions, Conservative MPs too have put party loyalty above the national interest. The first was the agreement of the United Kingdom and the European Union on an exit deal.How is it then that the UK has arrived at a juncture where its very existence is potentially at stake? The simple answer is that the Conservative PM David Cameron called the referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU because he wanted to kill off the growing hostility to the EU in his party and destroy the growing threat to the right posed by the nationalist UK Independence Party.Such an outcome would be rich in historic irony.